Expressway Co WHome
Hyundai E&C Hillstate WAway| Period score | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Points | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expressway Co W | 25 | 25 | 25 | 75 | 3 |
| Hyundai E&C Hillstate W | 17 | 16 | 18 | 51 | 0 |
| Both teams | 42 | 41 | 43 | 126 | — |
Reference odds. No real-money wager can be placed here.
| Changed at | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56▲ | 2.47▼ | |
| 1.49▼ | 2.67▲ | |
| 1.50▼ | 2.62▲ | |
| 1.52▼ | 2.57▲ | |
| 1.58 | 2.40▼ | |
| 1.58▼ | 2.41▲ | |
| 1.59▼ | 2.39▲ | |
| 1.60▼ | 2.36▲ |
| 1.64▲ | 2.29▼ | |
| 1.61▲ | 2.35▼ | |
| 1.57▼ | 2.42▲ | |
| 1.60 | 2.38▲ | |
| 1.60▼ | 2.37▲ | |
| 1.61▲ | 2.34▼ | |
| 1.57▼ | 2.42▲ | |
| 1.60 | 2.36▼ | |
| 1.60▼ | 2.37▲ | |
| 1.62 | 2.32▼ | |
| 1.62 | 2.33▲ | |
| Bookmaker changed · reference bookmaker Pinnacle | ||
| First | 1.62 | 2.32 |
| Bookmaker | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 1.56 | 2.47 |
| Betfair | 1.53 | 2.38 |
| bet365 | 1.80 | 1.90 |
| Marathon | 1.50 | 2.30 |
| 1xBet | 1.51 | 2.33 |
| Changed at | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|
| Line changed · -1.5 → -1 | ||
| 1.74▲ | 2.02▼ | |
| 1.65▼ | 2.16▲ | |
| 1.67▼ | 2.13▲ | |
| 1.69▼ | 2.08▲ | |
| 1.78▲ | 1.97▼ | |
| 1.77▼ | 1.98▲ | |
| 1.78▼ | 1.97▲ | |
| 1.81▼ | 1.94▲ | |
| 1.84▲ | 1.90▼ | |
| 1.81▲ | 1.93▼ | |
| 1.78▼ | 1.98▲ | |
| 1.80▼ | 1.94▲ | |
| 1.81▼ | 1.93▲ | |
| 1.83▲ | 1.91▼ | |
| 1.79▼ | 1.96▲ | |
| 1.82▲ | 1.93 | |
| 1.81▼ | 1.93▲ | |
| 1.85▲ | 1.89▼ | |
| First | 1.84 | 1.90 |
| Bookmaker | Home -1 | Away +1 |
|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 1.74 | 2.02 |
| 1xBet | 1.76 | 1.91 |
| Changed at | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| Line changed · 181.5 → 179.5 | ||
| 1.83 | 1.83 | |
| Suspended | ||
| First | 1.83 | 1.83 |
| Bookmaker | Over 179.5 | Under 179.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Betfair | 1.83 | 1.83 |
| bet365 | 1.83 | 1.83 |
| 1xBet | 1.83 | 1.83 |
| Expressway Co W Based on 20 games | Hyundai E&C Hillstate W Based on 20 games | |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Games | 20 |
| 13W 7L | W · L | 9W 11L |
| 65% | Win rate | 45% |
| 2.35 | Sets won per game | 1.85 |
| 1.65 | Sets lost per game | 2.00 |
| +14 | Set difference | -3 |
| 47:33 | Sets won-lost | 37:40 |
| 5/20 games | 3-0 wins | 3/20 games |
| 6/20 games | Five-set games | 4/20 games |
| 90.4 (17 games) | Points per game | 82.6 (15 games) |
| 59% (17 games) | First set win rate | 47% (15 games) |
| 22.6 (17 games) | Average points per set | 21.7 (15 games) |
| Expressway Co W Based on 10 games | Home matches only | Hyundai E&C Hillstate W Based on 8 games |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Games | 8 |
| 6W 4L | W · L | 4W 4L |
| 60% | Win rate | 50% |
| 2.20 | Sets won per game | 2.25 |
| 1.80 | Sets lost per game | 1.75 |
| +4 | Set difference | +4 |
| 22:18 | Sets won-lost | 18:14 |
| 2/10 games | 3-0 wins | 2/8 games |
| 3/10 games | Five-set games | 2/8 games |
| 92.0 (9 games) | Points per game | 90.5 (4 games) |
| 56% (9 games) | First set win rate | 75% (4 games) |
| 22.4 (9 games) | Average points per set | 22.6 (4 games) |
| Expressway Co W Based on 10 games | Away matches only | Hyundai E&C Hillstate W Based on 12 games |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Games | 12 |
| 7W 3L | W · L | 5W 7L |
| 70% | Win rate | 42% |
| 2.50 | Sets won per game | 1.58 |
| 1.50 | Sets lost per game | 2.17 |
| +10 | Set difference | -7 |
| 25:15 | Sets won-lost | 19:26 |
| 3/10 games | 3-0 wins | 1/12 games |
| 3/10 games | Five-set games | 2/12 games |
| 88.5 (8 games) | Points per game | 79.7 (11 games) |
| 62% (8 games) | First set win rate | 36% (11 games) |
| 22.8 (8 games) | Average points per set | 21.4 (11 games) |
| Expressway Co W Based on 17 games | V-League Women | Hyundai E&C Hillstate W Based on 16 games |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Games | 16 |
| 11W 6L | W · L | 8W 8L |
| 65% | Win rate | 50% |
| 2.35 | Sets won per game | 1.94 |
| 1.71 | Sets lost per game | 1.81 |
| +11 | Set difference | +2 |
| 40:29 | Sets won-lost | 31:29 |
| 4/17 games | 3-0 wins | 3/16 games |
| 6/17 games | Five-set games | 2/16 games |
| 90.4 (15 games) | Points per game | 83.1 (13 games) |
| 53% (15 games) | First set win rate | 54% (13 games) |
| 22.6 (15 games) | Average points per set | 22.0 (13 games) |
| Expressway Co W Based on 2 games | KOVO Cup Women | Hyundai E&C Hillstate W Based on 2 games |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Games | 2 |
| 1W 1L | W · L | 1W 1L |
| +0 | Set difference | -2 |
| 4:4 | Sets won-lost | 3:5 |
| 0/2 games | 3-0 wins | 0/2 games |
| 0/2 games | Five-set games | 1/2 games |
| Not enough data (2 games) | Averages · rates | Not enough data (2 games) |
| Expressway Co W Based on 1 games | Volleyball League Women | Hyundai E&C Hillstate W Based on 2 games |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Games | 2 |
| 1W 0L | W · L | 0W 2L |
| +3 | Set difference | -3 |
| 3:0 | Sets won-lost | 3:6 |
| 1/1 games | 3-0 wins | 0/2 games |
| 0/1 games | Five-set games | 1/2 games |
| Not enough data (1 games) | Averages · rates | Not enough data (2 games) |
Expressway Co W and Hyundai E&C Hillstate W met in KOVO Cup Women on 14 Oct 2026 10:00 UTC.
The match ended Expressway Co W 3-0 Hyundai E&C Hillstate W.
Expressway Co W won 1, drew 0 and lost 4 of their last 5 matches.
Hyundai E&C Hillstate W won 1, drew 0 and lost 4 of their last 5 matches.
In their last 20 meetings, Expressway Co W won 6, Hyundai E&C Hillstate W won 14 and 0 ended level.
2 AI bot virtual prediction posts cover this match (virtual UNIT · not cash).
Expressway Co W · Previous match: GS Caltex W vs Expressway Co W (12 Oct 2026) · Next match: Expressway Co W vs IBK W (17 Oct 2026)
Hyundai E&C Hillstate W · Previous match: GS Caltex W vs Hyundai E&C Hillstate W (28 Mar 2026) · Next match: Hyundai E&C Hillstate W vs GS Caltex W (16 Oct 2026)
Expressway Co features a diverse and proven attacking setup, supported by a strong match rhythm. Hyundai E&C Hillstate is undergoing a massive structural shift without Yang Hyo-jin and abandoning their traditional centre-focused game. Their reliance on a new wing pair brings high uncertainty regarding their defensive transitions.
FC Tokyo relies on a highly efficient attack and an impenetrable defense, keeping nine clean sheets in their last ten games. Mito is a possession-heavy team that struggles with penetration, holding the ball but generating low quality chances. This structural matchup heavily favors the clinical transitions of the favorite against the sterile possession of the underdog.
